Canadian law profs’ statement on Tsleil-Waututh Nation rejection of Kinder Morgan pipeline

Date:

We write as professors of law at several Canadian law schools to recognize and commemorate the May 26, 2015 release of Tsleil-Waututh Nation’s Assessment of the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Pipeline and Tanker Expansion (“TMEX”) Proposal (the “Assessment”).

Tsleil-Waututh carried out its Assessment pursuant to its Stewardship Policy, which is an expression of the nation’s inherent jurisdiction and law. The Assessment involved a review of the potential impacts of the TMEX proposal – not only impacts on the biophysical environment, but also on Tsleil-Waututh’s interconnected cultural, spiritual, legal and governance rights and responsibilities. Legal principles that guided the assessment were drawn from Tsleil-Waututh traditional narratives and other Coast Salish traditional and contemporary sources.

The inherent jurisdiction and laws which Tsleil-Waututh relied on in completing its Assessmentexist independently of, and pre-date the assertion of sovereignty by Canada. Section 35(1) of the Canadian Constitution recognizes and affirms such existing Aboriginal rights, including Aboriginal title and governance rights.

Read full article here.

MAY 26, 2015.

Signed:

Gordon Christie, Director, Indigenous Legal Studies Program, University of British Columbia

Sakej Youngblood Henderson, Research Director, Native Law Centre of Canada, University of Saskatchewan

Andrée Boisselle, Assistant Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School

Nicole Schabus, Janna Promislow and Charis Kamphuis, Faculty of Law, Thompson Rivers University

Want More Investigative Content?

Curate RegWatch
Curate RegWatchhttps://regulatorwatch.com
In addition to our original coverage, RegWatch curates top stories on issues and impacts arising from the regulation of economic, social and environmental activity in Canada and the U.S.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

MORE VAPING