The 2019 “Evali” Misinfodemic (Pt 3)

Date:

Smoking is the number one cause of all preventable cancers, heart and lung disease. 

The death toll from smoking this year will exceed – by far – the number of people projected to die from COVID-19.  The COVID-19 pandemic will eventually end.  It is less clear when the current 100-year-long smoking “epidemic” will end.  Decreasing public misperceptions surrounding alternatives to smoking might help.

Recent surveys show a dramatic increase in the number of people who believe that nicotine vaping is as harmful as, or more harmful than, smoking (see Parts One and Two, and the Foundation’s Global State of Smoking Polls from 2017 and 2019).  Misperception of relative risks worsened in many countries as the US official misdiagnosis of the “EVALI” outbreak filtered through the media to the public.

Public misunderstanding may cause substantial harm if it convinces people who use safer nicotine products to return to smoking, discourages smokers from quitting, and encourages policy makers to embrace taxes and bans that favor cigarette sales.  Which begs the question:  Are “safer nicotine products” truly safer?

In the case of a smokeless tobacco product called snus, the answer is clearly “yes” based on decades of epidemiological data.  In October 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized a snus manufacturer to advertise its products as safer than cigarettes.  So yes, safer.

We do not have long-term epidemiological data on nicotine vaping.  These products have only been used by millions of people for 14 years.  But we do know that smoking shortens the lives of half of all long-term smokers by 10 years.  And we now have a substantial (and growing) body of evidence on the constituents of nicotine vapor, as well as the short- and medium-term health effects in humans.

It took years to develop a scientific consensus that smoking kills.  The first major confirmation came from the British Doctors Study, launched in 1951.  Findings from that study played a central role in the pivotal 1962 Royal College of Physicians report on Smoking and Health, which heralded the early beginnings of tobacco control (two years before the first US Surgeon General report on smoking).

Thankfully, science works faster today.  Some claim it would take a modern toxicologist less than a week to prove that cigarette smoke is toxic.  A growing list of scientific and public health organizations have reviewed all the available evidence from thousands of scientific studies on safer nicotine products including snus and nicotine vaping products (see list below and here).

Read full article here.

Charles Gardner – Foundation For a Smoke-Free World – June 18, 2020.

Want More Investigative Content?

Curate RegWatch
Curate RegWatchhttps://regulatorwatch.com
In addition to our original coverage, RegWatch curates top stories on issues and impacts arising from the regulation of economic, social and environmental activity in Canada and the U.S.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

MORE VAPING

Vaping Coverage Get it NOW!

Sign Up for Incisive Content!

RegWatch original video is designed to move opinion. Get our videos first and be the first to share.

Your Information will never be shared with any third party