Officials who act as conduits for foreign vested interest groups should be fired – solon


MANILA, Philippines — Government officials who serve as conduits for foreign vested interest groups trying to influence local policies should be fired, Ako Bicol Rep. Alfredo A. Garbin Jr. said in a statement issued on Sunday.

“While I commend foreign private institutions that support government initiatives, I condemn moves to hijack government policy decisions,” Garbin said.

Garbin issued the statement in reaction to reports that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) received grants Bloomberg Philanthropies and The Union — two lobby groups that promote the banning of vapor products and heated tobacco products (HTPs) low- and middle-income countries.

The FDA admitted receiving the grants during a public hearing on the guidelines it was drafting on the regulation of e-cigarettes, vapor products, and heated tobacco products (HTPs) raising concerns over a potential conflict of interest.

“I call on the FDA to maintain its objectivity and independence and not allow nongovernment organizations and their agents in government to run the agency,” Garbin said.

On Oct. 6 and 8 2020, the FDA conducted public consultations on the draft regulations. During one of the hearings, a ranking FDA official admitted that the regulatory agency received grants from The Union and Bloomberg Philanthropies.

The latter funds The Bloomberg Initiative to Reduce Tobacco Use Grants Program, a campaign co-managed by the Union that is dedicated to tobacco and vaping control policies.

The public hearing was postponed after several stakeholders and government officials raised issues about the lack of meaningful discussion and the failure of the FDA to address the concerns of consumers and industry players.

Despite not completing the public consultations, the FDA issued Administrative Order No. 2020- 0055 — or the Regulation on Vapor and Heated Tobacco Products in January 2021.

“The FDA must issue science-based regulations and probe into erring officials who are serving the private agenda of foreign private organizations by advancing anti-vaping policies instead of objective and workable regulations,” Garbin said.

Read full article here. – March 15, 2021.

Want More Investigative Content?

Curate RegWatch
Curate RegWatch
In addition to our original coverage, RegWatch curates top stories on issues and impacts arising from the regulation of economic, social and environmental activity in Canada and the U.S.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Out of Sync | Sweanor Calls For “Rethink” On Vaping at...

What’s driving Health Canada’s war on vaping? Does the regulator favour drug harm reduction over tobacco harm reduction? And is it too late to...

Vaping Coverage Get it NOW!

Sign Up for Incisive Content!

RegWatch original video is designed to move opinion. Get our videos first and be the first to share.

Your Information will never be shared with any third party